WHEN AND WHY WAS EDUCATION ADDED TO CONCURRENT LIST?
When
and Why Was Education Added to the Concurrent List?
The Indian Constitution provides a
unique structure for distributing legislative powers between the Union and
State governments. This division is outlined in the Seventh Schedule, which
includes three lists: the Union List, the State List, and the Concurrent List.
While many people know about these categories, not everyone is aware that education
wasn’t always on the Concurrent List. In fact, it was added later, through a
key constitutional amendment. Let's explore when and why education was moved to
the Concurrent List and what that change meant for the country.
Understanding
the Lists in the Constitution
Before diving into the history of
education’s shift, it’s important to understand the basic framework:
- Union List: Subjects under the exclusive
control of the central government (e.g., defense, foreign affairs).
- State List: Subjects on which only state
governments can legislate (e.g., police, public health).
- Concurrent List: Subjects where both the
central and state governments can make laws. If there is a conflict, the
central law takes precedence.
Originally, education was a State
subject, which meant only state governments had the authority to legislate
and manage educational policies and systems.
When
Was Education Added to the Concurrent List?
Education was moved from the State
List to the Concurrent List through the 42nd Amendment to the Constitution
of India in 1976.
This amendment was enacted during
the period of Emergency (1975–1977) under the leadership of Prime
Minister Indira Gandhi. It is one of the most significant constitutional
amendments in Indian history and affected many areas of governance.
Why
Was the Change Made?
There were several reasons behind
this shift:
1.
National Integration and Uniformity
India is a diverse country with multiple
states, languages, and cultures. Having education under state control led to
varied curricula, standards, and policies. By bringing it under the Concurrent
List, the central government could ensure more uniform standards across the
country, especially in subjects like science, history, and national values.
2.
Stronger Central Role in Planning
India was aiming for rapid
development during the 1970s. The central government wanted a stronger role in
shaping educational policy nationwide, particularly to align education with
national development goals.
3.
Better Coordination and Resource Sharing
Central involvement allowed for
better allocation of funds, policy coordination, and educational
reforms. This shift enabled programs like Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Mid-Day
Meal Scheme, and more recently, the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.
4.
Response to Global Trends
Many developed countries were
centralizing their education systems to raise national competitiveness. India
followed this trend to ensure its population was educated in line with global
standards.
What
Did This Change Mean for India?
With education on the Concurrent
List:
- Both central and state
governments can make laws on education.
- Central government can now
introduce national programs and policies more effectively.
- State governments retain the
flexibility to
adapt education policies to local needs, as long as they do not conflict
with national laws.
- In case of a legal conflict, the
central law overrides the state law on the subject of education.
This balance has helped shape
India’s education system into a more unified yet adaptable model
Comments
Post a Comment