WHEN AND WHY WAS EDUCATION ADDED TO CONCURRENT LIST?

When and Why Was Education Added to the Concurrent List?

The Indian Constitution provides a unique structure for distributing legislative powers between the Union and State governments. This division is outlined in the Seventh Schedule, which includes three lists: the Union List, the State List, and the Concurrent List. While many people know about these categories, not everyone is aware that education wasn’t always on the Concurrent List. In fact, it was added later, through a key constitutional amendment. Let's explore when and why education was moved to the Concurrent List and what that change meant for the country.


Understanding the Lists in the Constitution

Before diving into the history of education’s shift, it’s important to understand the basic framework:

  • Union List: Subjects under the exclusive control of the central government (e.g., defense, foreign affairs).
  • State List: Subjects on which only state governments can legislate (e.g., police, public health).
  • Concurrent List: Subjects where both the central and state governments can make laws. If there is a conflict, the central law takes precedence.

Originally, education was a State subject, which meant only state governments had the authority to legislate and manage educational policies and systems.


When Was Education Added to the Concurrent List?

Education was moved from the State List to the Concurrent List through the 42nd Amendment to the Constitution of India in 1976.

This amendment was enacted during the period of Emergency (1975–1977) under the leadership of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. It is one of the most significant constitutional amendments in Indian history and affected many areas of governance.


Why Was the Change Made?

There were several reasons behind this shift:

1. National Integration and Uniformity

India is a diverse country with multiple states, languages, and cultures. Having education under state control led to varied curricula, standards, and policies. By bringing it under the Concurrent List, the central government could ensure more uniform standards across the country, especially in subjects like science, history, and national values.

2. Stronger Central Role in Planning

India was aiming for rapid development during the 1970s. The central government wanted a stronger role in shaping educational policy nationwide, particularly to align education with national development goals.

3. Better Coordination and Resource Sharing

Central involvement allowed for better allocation of funds, policy coordination, and educational reforms. This shift enabled programs like Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Mid-Day Meal Scheme, and more recently, the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.

4. Response to Global Trends

Many developed countries were centralizing their education systems to raise national competitiveness. India followed this trend to ensure its population was educated in line with global standards.


What Did This Change Mean for India?

With education on the Concurrent List:

  • Both central and state governments can make laws on education.
  • Central government can now introduce national programs and policies more effectively.
  • State governments retain the flexibility to adapt education policies to local needs, as long as they do not conflict with national laws.
  • In case of a legal conflict, the central law overrides the state law on the subject of education.

This balance has helped shape India’s education system into a more unified yet adaptable model

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WHEN DID EDUCATION START IN INDIA

What Education Is Required for a Pilot

What Education Is Needed to Become an Army Soldier?